AVY · Q4 2025 Earnings
CautiousAvery Dennison
Reported February 4, 2026
30-second summary
30-second take: Revenue of $2.27B grew 3.9% YoY with non-GAAP EPS of $2.45 landing at the high end of the $2.35-$2.45 guide, and FY2025 closed at $8.86B revenue (+1.1%) and $9.53 EPS. The CEO's headline admission — "I am not satisfied with our organic revenue growth" — paired with Q1 FY2026 organic guidance of just 0-2% and an explicit refusal to assume any macro tailwind tells you the base business is gridlocked into at least mid-2026. Adjusted operating margin of 12.4% and 6% midpoint EPS growth on flat organic sales confirms the equity story is now entirely about internal levers (productivity, restructuring savings, high-value mix) absorbing wage inflation and tariff drag.
Headline numbers
EPS
Q4 FY2025
$2.45
Revenue
Q4 FY2025
$2.27B
+3.9% YoY
Gross margin
Q4 FY2025
28.6%
Free cash flow
Q4 FY2025
$0.30B
Operating margin
Q4 FY2025
10.6%
Key financials
Q4 FY2025| Metric | Q4 FY2025 | YoY | Q3 FY2025 | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.27B | +3.9% | $2.22B | +2.5% |
| EPS | $2.45 | — | $2.37 | +3.4% |
| Gross margin | 28.6% | — | 28.6% | +0bps |
| Operating margin | 10.6% | — | 11.9% | -130bps |
| Free cash flow | $0.30B | — | $0.27B | +12.8% |
Guidance
Q4 FY2025 results met guidance at high end for adjusted EPS; Q1 FY2026 guidance issued with 6% adjusted EPS growth at midpoint on muted 0–2% organic sales growth, signaling continued macro caution.
Guidance is issued for the full year only, refreshed each quarter. Prior and new below are the same FY updated this quarter.
Actuals vs prior guidance
| Metric | Period | Prior guide | Actual | Δ | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted EPS | Q4 FY2025 | $2.35 to $2.45 | 2.45 | at high end of guide | Met |
| Reported EPS | Q4 FY2025 | $2.15 to $2.25 | 2.15 | at low end of guide | Met |
New guidance
| Metric | Period | Guide | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted EPS | Q1 FY2026 | $2.40 to $2.46 | — |
| Reported EPS | Q1 FY2026 | $2.27 to $2.33 | — |
| Organic sales growth | Q1 FY2026 | 0% to 2% | — |
Segment KPIs
Q4 FY2025| Segment | Q4 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Group | $1.547B | +5.1% |
| Solutions Group | $0.724B | +1.5% |
| Materials Group Adjusted Operating Margin | 14.2% | — |
| Solutions Group Adjusted Operating Margin | 11.2% | — |
Other KPIs
Q4 FY2025| Segment | Q4 FY2025 |
|---|---|
| Adjusted Operating Margin | 12.4% |
| Adjusted EBITDA Margin | 16.2% |
| High-Value Categories as % of Revenue | ~45% |
| Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA | 2.4x |
| Share Repurchases | $119M |
| Dividends Paid | $191M |
Management tone
Tariff impacts manageable (Q2) → temporary headwind (Q3) → persistent constraint requiring "decisive action" (Q4): The arc across three quarters tells the story. In Q2 management said the trade policy impact was "unclear" and they were "prepared for various scenarios." In Q3 they hardened it to "temporary headwind" while keeping the cyclical framing intact. This quarter, the CEO said the quiet part out loud: "While I am pleased with our ability to protect margins and earnings in this environment, I am not satisfied with our organic revenue growth." That is a meaningfully different posture — margin defense is now explicitly framed as insufficient, and growth requires "decisive action." The acknowledgment of falling short of the 10% adjusted EPS target (delivered 7% ex-FX) lands in the same paragraph, anchoring the dissatisfaction to a quantified miss rather than vague disappointment.
Expecting macro improvement to help (implicit through Q2-Q3) → explicit refusal to plan for any macro tailwind in 2026 (Q4): For most of 2025 management's framing left room for sequential improvement as tariff uncertainty resolved. This quarter that door is closed: "Given key economic indicators remain largely consistent with 2025 levels, we are not planning for any macroeconomic tailwinds in the near term. Our performance will instead be driven by the levers within our control." The shift signals management has concluded the macro will not bail them out — every dollar of 2026 earnings growth has to come from restructuring savings ($50M), high-value mix, and productivity. Investors should model accordingly.
Apparel recovery thesis (Q3) → apparel back to -7% in Q4 (worse than expected) → structural retailer behavior shift (Q4 Q&A): Q3 had base apparel still down low-single-digits but total apparel UP low-single-digits, which read as the start of a recovery. The Q4 print broke that read — apparel volumes declined ~7%, worse than management's own low-single-digit expectation, and the diagnosis is structural: retailers have shifted from forward-placing (historically 60% of orders) to chasing (now closer to 40%). That is not a cyclical inventory bounce-back; it is a sustained behavioral change driven by post-tariff pricing uncertainty. The Q1 2026 "return to growth" framing for apparel and general retail now sits on shakier footing than it did three months ago.
Intelligent Labels as defense ("we are taking the right actions" in Q2) → offense (Walmart announcement in Q3) → conviction with caveats (Q4): The Walmart deal anchored Q3's IL narrative. This quarter management committed to IL growing above 2025's low-single-digit pace, with a second grocery customer rollout expected mid-2026 as a key inflection point. But the framing was deliberately careful — "continue to anticipate growth in this platform above the pace we achieved in 2025" is not a number, and the apparel/general merchandise tariff drag is now explicitly cited as the reason 2025 IL growth disappointed. Conviction in the platform remains, but the timeline for reacceleration has slipped right.
Confidence in the 2020-2025 cycle plan → acknowledgment of EPS target miss with no equivalent commitment for the next cycle: The CEO's admission that adjusted EPS came in at 7% (ex-FX) versus a 10% target is the most direct concession on long-term execution made all year. The reframing — "our focus is to shift our organic sales growth trajectory to achieve our targets for this cycle" — accepts the miss and pivots to the next cycle without restating the cycle targets in quantified form. That is a tonally defensive posture; the structural-strength language ("structurally stronger to deliver longer-term value creation") is doing the work that quantified targets used to do.
Recurring themes management leaned on this quarter:
Risks management surfaced:
Q&A highlights
George Staffos · Bank of America Securities
Request to parse the 40 basis point materials margin drop in Q4, specifically on employer-related costs and raw material impacts despite reported deflation.
Greg explained that soft base volumes required productivity actions to offset wage inflation; prior-year one-time items (few cents) created a headwind; extra calendar days (4) with fixed costs but soft shipping days contributed to margin compression. Q3-to-Q4 sequential decline of ~60 bps is historically typical due to holiday impacts and VI labels mix.
Josh Spector · UBS
Apparel market declines exceeded expectations in Q4; how should we think about trajectory with tough 1Q comps but easier 2Q comps and visibility into apparel producer production plans.
Dion explained that tariff uncertainty remains high and can shift rapidly. Q4 saw ~7% decline (worse than low single-digit expectation) driven by: (1) changed retailer supply chain behavior—less forward placing, more chasing; (2) Q3 volume was holiday stock-up; (3) retailers protecting margins, less discounting. Retail growth is price-driven, not unit-driven. Q1 2026 will be challenging, but growth expected thereafter if tariff uncertainty doesn't escalate further. Retail inventory-to-sales ratios at pandemic lows suggest room for recovery.
John McNulty · BMO Capital Markets
Margin differential for high-value categories versus core; has that differential shifted since 2019 to 2025?
High-value categories have higher variable margins than the rest of the portfolio—multiple points above average and significantly above base categories. Gross profit margins have expanded a couple of points over the last few years, with high-value category mix shift being a major driver alongside productivity actions. High-value categories have grown more than 6% organically since 2019. Management emphasized that high-value categories provide utility beyond simple application (e.g., adhesives for noise dampening, IL for food safety, clean flake for recyclability) and continuous innovation drives margin extraction.
Gansham Punjabi · Robert W. Baird
Guidance on intelligent labels growth for 2026 given low single-digit 2025 performance; outlook for other high-value categories (Vescom, Embellex); why only quarterly guidance going forward.
Dion expects IL 2026 growth rate above 2025 levels; 2025 headwind was largely apparel and general merchandise tariff impacts. Confidence in IL platform justified by: new customer adoption, extended use cases (e.g., loss prevention), second grocery customer rollout expected mid-year (significant inflection point), expanded logistics pilots. Most high-value categories expected mid-single-digit plus growth. Vescom and Embellex specifically anticipated at mid-single-digit growth. Quarterly guidance only due to dynamic environment and recent cyclical shocks (pandemic, inflation, supply chain, tariffs) limiting visibility; remains confident in strategies but not planning for macro tailwinds in 2026.
Jeff Sakakis · J.P. Morgan
Walmart partnership impact on grocery inquiries; magnitude of 2025 temporary savings headwind in 2026.
Walmart announcement has catalyzed increased inquiries and pipeline growth from other grocers (bakery, protein) both domestically and in Europe; pilots and trials expected but no major rollouts anticipated in 2026. Temporary savings headwind (largely incentive comp) is expected to be similar in magnitude to $50M restructuring savings. Additional productivity beyond restructuring expected from ELS savings, scrap reduction, operational efficiency, and digital G&A initiatives; network inefficiencies from 2025 tariff production shifts should reverse in 2026.
Answers to last quarter's watch list
What to watch into next quarter
Q1 2026 organic sales landing at the high end of 0-2%: A print at 0% would mark four consecutive quarters of near-zero organic growth and force a re-rating of the "structural strength" narrative. A print at 2% with apparel showing sequential improvement validates the "return to growth" framing.
Q1 2026 non-GAAP EPS landing within $2.40-$2.46: Below $2.40 would be the first quarterly EPS miss of the cycle and undermine the margin-defense thesis. The midpoint implies ~6% YoY EPS growth, which depends heavily on $50M restructuring savings flowing through cleanly against $50M of incentive comp normalization.
Apparel volume direction in Q1: Management explicitly said apparel will "return to growth" in 2026 — but Q1 still laps a stronger Q1 2025 comp. A Q1 apparel print still in negative-single-digits would push the recovery thesis into H2 and signal the retailer behavioral shift (forward placing → chasing) is durable.
Second grocery customer rollout disclosure: Management cited the mid-2026 rollout as a "significant inflection point" for IL growth. Watch for the customer name, scope (bakery/deli/protein), and store count to be disclosed in Q1 or Q2 — silence on this through Q2 would push the IL reacceleration story to 2027.
High-value category percent of revenue moving above 45%: Management quantified high-value at ~45% of FY2025 revenue with variable margins multiple points above average. A Q1 print showing this share holding flat or declining would signal the mix shift that has been carrying margins is stalling — a material concern given the company's reliance on this lever in the no-macro-help framing.
Net debt / EBITDA trajectory from 2.4x: FY2025 capital returns of $861M were funded alongside the Taylor Adhesives acquisition. Watch whether leverage moves higher into Q1 (signaling M&A activity or further buybacks ahead of cash flow recovery) or back toward the lower end of management's comfort range (signaling a more conservative posture).
Sources
- Avery Dennison Q4 2025 Press Release (Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1): https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/8818/000000881826000004/ex9918k2-4x26.htm
- Q4 2025 earnings call transcript and Q&A (analyst exchanges referenced above)
- Avery Dennison Q3 2025 brief (Tapebrief) for prior-quarter watch list and guidance baseline
- Avery Dennison Q2 2025 brief (Tapebrief) for multi-quarter tone arc
Get the next brief, free.
We publish analyst-grade earnings briefs the same day or morning after every call — headline numbers, segment KPIs, Q&A highlights, and tone analysis. Free during beta.
This is not investment advice.