tapebrief

FE · Q1 2026 Earnings

Bullish

FirstEnergy

Reported April 28, 2026

30-second summary

30-second take: FirstEnergy posted Q1 FY2026 Core EPS of $0.72 on revenue of $4.2B (+10.5% YoY), and reaffirmed FY26 Core EPS guidance of $2.62–$2.82. The signal is in the pipeline mechanics: management said ~4 GW of the data-center pipeline is in final contract negotiations and is expected to convert to construction agreements within Q1 itself — "nearly doubling our contracted demand." Paired with a $1.4B Q1 CapEx run-rate against a $6.0B FY26 plan, a $36B 2026–2030 plan, and a ~10% rate-base CAGR, this is execution converting the Q3 forward-plan reset into bookable commercial reality.

Headline numbers

EPS

Q1 FY2026

$0.72

0.0% vs est.

Revenue

Q1 FY2026

$4.20B

+10.5% YoY

+9.4% vs est.

Key financials

Q1 FY2026
MetricQ1 FY2026YoYQ3 FY2025QoQ
Revenue$4.20B+10.5%$4.10B+2.4%
EPS$0.72$0.83-13.3%

Guidance

FirstEnergy raised FY2026 Core EPS guidance by $0.12–$0.26 (5–10%) to $2.62–$2.82, significantly outperforming Q1 revenue expectations while reaffirming longer-term CAGR near the top end of 6–8%.

Guidance is issued for the full year only, refreshed each quarter. Prior and new below are the same FY updated this quarter.

Actuals vs prior guidance

MetricPeriodPrior guideActualΔResult
RevenueQ1 FY2026$4.2 billion+$0.36B (+9.4%) above consensus estimate of $3.84BBeat
Core EPSQ1 FY2026$0.72in-line with consensus estimate of $0.72Met

New guidance

MetricPeriodGuideYoY
Core Earnings CAGRFY2026–FY2030near the top end of 6–8% (2026–2030)

Changes to prior guidance

MetricPeriodPrior guideNew guideΔResult
Core EPS
FY2026
$2.50 to $2.56$2.62 to $2.82+$0.12 to +$0.26 at midpoint (+5.1% to +10.4%)Raised

Other KPIs

Q1 FY2026
SegmentQ1 FY2026
Capital Investment (Q1 2026)$1.4 billion
2026 Planned Capital Investment$6.0 billion
2026-2030 Capital Investment Plan$36 billion
Trailing Twelve-Month ROE9.8%
Transmission Rate Base Growth (Integrated segment)19%
Stand-Alone Transmission Rate Base Growth11%
2026-2030 Rate Base CAGR~10%

Management tone

Data center load has moved from "pipeline" to "contracted within the quarter." Prior-quarter disclosure framed the pipeline as a future opportunity. This quarter management said the pipeline is converting in real time: "Approximately four gigawatts of our total pipeline is in final contract negotiations and are expected to become contracted with a construction agreement within this quarter, nearly doubling our contracted demand." This is the inflection from disclosure to bookings — a "doubling of contracted demand" inside one quarter changes the basis for the 2026–2030 plan from forecast to backlog.

West Virginia generation has moved from "we plan to file" to "executing contracts upon approval." The prior quarter disclosed the 1.2 GW gas project with a Q1 2026 filing date. This quarter the CPCN has been filed and management is "simultaneously working through contracts for major equipment, EPC, and gas supply with all of this work on track. Upon regulatory approval, we expect to be in a position to execute these agreements." Three quarters ago WV generation was a speculative integrated-state play; today it is a near-binding commercial sequence waiting only on the regulator.

Affordability has flipped from defensive posture to proactive positioning. Earlier quarters mentioned affordability as a regulatory risk factor. This quarter management opens the affordability discussion as a competitive lever: "we are proactively having constructive conversations with elected officials and regulators in each of our states to look for ways to address questions around affordability for our customers." The Q&A reinforced this with specific reliability proof points (Pennsylvania customer interruption duration down 27 minutes since 2024; New Jersey outage duration improved 16%). This is FE using operational deliverables to neutralize the rate-case political headwind, not just acknowledging the headwind.

CEO conviction language has hardened. Across prior quarters management telegraphed possibility ("up to 18%"). This quarter the CEO said "What I observed during the first three months of this year further strengthens my commitment to our strategic direction" — a notable shift from defending the plan to affirming it based on operational evidence. The "near the top end" CAGR language is the numeric expression of the same posture.

Transmission competitive procurement reframed as a track record, not a pipeline. "Over the last four years, we have been awarded more than $5 billion in competitive projects, and we expect more opportunity in future solicitations." The 80–85% core / 15–20% competitive split disclosed in Q&A puts the competitive piece in proportion — it is the upside lever, not the base case, and management is now using the win history rather than the forward opportunity set to underwrite the next round.

Recurring themes management leaned on this quarter:

Data center demand acceleration and contracted pipeline growthGeneration investment (natural gas and incremental capacity) tied to West Virginia economic developmentTransmission expansion and competitive procurement successCustomer affordability through operational efficiency and innovative rate designRegulatory collaboration and stakeholder alignment driving outcomesFormula rate capital recovery supporting investment and earnings growth

Risks management surfaced:

Capacity market construct not attracting significant incremental generation (demand/supply imbalance)Regulatory approval required for 1.2 GW natural gas facility in West VirginiaData center contracts subject to execution and regulatory approvalCustomer affordability sensitivity to variable price contracts and supply rate volatilityForward-looking statements subject to risks and uncertainties per cautionary language

Q&A highlights

Char Perez · Wells Fargo

Timing of West Virginia generation investment spend, turbine queue status for incremental generation, and impact on CAGR profile. Also asked about Pennsylvania affordability concerns and rate case timing strategy.

Turbine delivery on track for 2031 online date. CPCN approval expected Q4 2024, which would increase rate-based growth from 10%+ to 11%+. On Pennsylvania, management emphasized engagement with Governor Shapiro, noting reliability improvements (27 minutes reduction in customer interruption duration since 2024) and staying close to regulators on affordability concerns. No surprise rate filings planned.

Turbine equipment delivery on track for 2031 power plant onlineCPCN approval expected early Q4 2024Rate-based growth increase from 10%+ to 11%+ upon approvalPennsylvania customer average interruption duration down 27 minutes since 2024

Nick Campanella · Barclays

Frameworks to facilitate next phase of load growth in West Virginia beyond initial gigawatt, including tariff requirements and replicable sector models. Also asked about funding and financing mix for additional capital.

Management emphasized hyperscaler preference to pay full fair share for all consumption (transmission, generation, land). Referenced Michigan model with potential customer rate reductions. For West Virginia generation investment, expects up to 35% funded with new equity, with AFUDC cash recovery funding portion. Expects similar equity ratios as new investments are layered into plan.

35% of West Virginia generation investment expected to be funded with new equityAFUDC cash recovery to fund portion of investmentSimilar equity ratios expected for future investment additionsMichigan model referenced as best practice with potential customer rate benefits

Steve Fleischman · Wolf Research

Pennsylvania political backdrop regarding affordability concerns, recent peer rate case withdrawal, stay-out implications, and timing strategy. Also asked about West Virginia power plant final costing versus initial estimates.

Management stated no negative inferences should be drawn from peer actions; Governor Shapiro is thoughtful on energy issues and saved PJM billions through negotiated caps. Company proceeding with investment plans and confident in Pennsylvania returns while being cognizant of affordability. On West Virginia, maintains confidence in $2.5 billion plant estimate; noted seller's market for turbines with implicit warning to equipment suppliers about political implications of aggressive pricing.

$2.5 billion power plant cost estimate maintainedContingencies included in West Virginia cost estimateTurbine seller's market conditions acknowledgedPennsylvania customer average interruption duration improved 20% (2024-2025)

Jeremy Toney · JP Morgan

Transmission investment opportunity set in PGM open window, scope of opportunities, and process status. Also asked about affordability differentiation in New Jersey and how lower bill status resonates with stakeholders.

Management noted $5 billion transmission investment secured over 4 years through evolving competitive business model with partnerships. 80-85% of transmission CapEx is core system work, not competitive projects. On affordability, highlighted that FirstEnergy bills are among lowest in operating states, rates increasing slower than inflation, and emphasized 16% improvement in New Jersey outage duration (49 minutes per customer). Acknowledged customers squeezed by multiple cost categories beyond energy bills.

$5 billion transmission investment secured over 4 years80-85% of transmission CapEx directed to existing system maintenanceFirstEnergy bills among lowest in operating statesCompany rates increasing at rate lower than inflation

Andrew Wiseau · Scotiabank

Details on cost-cutting measures and 5% year-over-year O&M expense reduction, including whether savings are structural versus one-time, jurisdiction-specific impacts, AI/automation role, and reliability implications.

Management characterized savings as sustainable, driven by shift from reactive to predictive, data-analytics-driven decision-making since 2022. Company is shrinking service core, increasing business unit presence to move customer management closer to customers. Described cost management program as integral to company's future operational model. Indicated confidence in continued cost reduction opportunities.

5% year-over-year O&M expense reductionO&M expenses below latest rate case approvals across jurisdictionsContinuous improvement program running since 2022 with sustainable benefitsShift to predictive, data-analytics-driven decision-making

Answers to last quarter's watch list

FFO/Debt 14%+ target survival in the 2026–2030 plan refresh — Not explicitly reaffirmed in the press-release materials reviewed; the credit metric was not called out alongside the $36B plan and ~10% rate base CAGR. The Q&A on WV financing (up to 35% equity, AFUDC cash recovery) is the indirect signal that management is layering equity to protect credit metrics, but a hard FFO/Debt floor was not restated. Status: Continue monitoring
Equity issuance disclosure tied to higher CapEx — Substantively answered. Management told Barclays that "up to 35% of the West Virginia generation investment is expected to be funded with new equity" with "similar equity ratios expected as new investments are layered into plan." Equity is now an explicit funding lever for the larger plan. Status: Resolved negatively (for shareholders watching dilution; resolved positively for credit)
West Virginia PSC filing details — Answered. The CPCN for the 1.2 GW gas facility has been filed; the $2.5B cost estimate is reaffirmed with contingencies included; equipment, EPC, and gas-supply contracts are progressing in parallel and will be executed upon regulatory approval. CPCN approval is expected early Q4 2026 per Q&A. Status: Resolved positively
Q4'25 EPS landing within the $2.50–$2.56 range — Not directly disclosed in the materials available; the FY26 reaffirmed range of $2.62–$2.82 is the forward anchor. Status: Continue monitoring
Hard dollar number for 2026–2030 transmission CapEx — Partial. The total 2026–2030 capital investment plan is now disclosed at $36B with $6.0B in 2026; the transmission-specific allocation within that was not separately broken out. Status: Continue monitoring

What to watch into next quarter

Whether the ~4 GW of "in final negotiation" data center contracts actually executes by end of Q1 as guided — management committed to "within this quarter." Failure to deliver this in the Q2 print would materially undermine the conviction language; delivery on or above 4 GW is the cleanest evidence of pipeline-to-backlog conversion.

WV CPCN approval timing vs. the implied Q4 2026 schedule — Q&A pointed to early Q4 approval as the trigger for stepping rate-base growth from "10%+ to 11%+." Slippage past year-end would push the rate-base step into 2027.

Whether FY26 EPS guidance gets narrowed or raised at Q2 — H2-weighted earnings cadence was flagged; a Q2 print materially above the implied first-half run-rate would set up a narrow-to-upper-half move on Q3.

Hard transmission-only dollar figure within the $36B plan — the missing denominator from prior framing is still missing; investors need to size the transmission piece to compare against prior allocations.

Reaffirmation (or revision) of the FFO/Debt floor — with 35% equity funding now disclosed for WV generation, the credit-metric anchor has changed in composition. Explicit guidance on the target should land in the next plan-refresh disclosure.

Sources

  1. FirstEnergy Q1 2026 News Release — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1031296/000103129626000084/ex991-q12026newsrelease.htm

Get the next brief, free.

We publish analyst-grade earnings briefs the same day or morning after every call — headline numbers, segment KPIs, Q&A highlights, and tone analysis. Free during beta.

This is not investment advice.