WMB · Q1 2026 Earnings
BullishWilliams Companies
Reported May 4, 2026
30-second summary
Williams delivered Q1 Adjusted EBITDA of $2.254B (+13% YoY) with record AFFO of $1.770B and net income of $864M, then used the print to raise FY26 growth capex by $900M at the midpoint to $7.0–7.6B and signal the upper half of the $8.05–8.35B EBITDA guide range. The trade-off is the same as last quarter, escalated: leverage drifts another 0.1x to ~4.1x for 2026 to fund a contracted power and pipeline backlog that now includes a fifth major power project (NEO, 682 MW) and three new major commercialized projects in a single quarter.
Headline numbers
EPS
Q1 FY2026
$0.73
Revenue
Q1 FY2026
$3.03B
-0.6% YoY
Operating margin
Q1 FY2026
43.6%
Key financials
Q1 FY2026| Metric | Q1 FY2026 | YoY | Q4 FY2025 | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.03B | -0.6% | — | — |
| EPS | $0.73 | — | $0.55 | +32.7% |
| Operating margin | 43.6% | — | — | — |
Guidance
Williams raised FY2026 growth capex guidance by $0.9B to $7.0–7.6B while maintaining EBITDA targets and modestly increasing leverage expectations to 4.1x.
Guidance is issued for the full year only, refreshed each quarter. Prior and new below are the same FY updated this quarter.
Changes to prior guidance
| Metric | Period | Prior guide | New guide | Δ | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth CapEx | FY 2026 | $6.1 billion to $6.7 billion | $7.0 billion to $7.6 billion | +$0.9B to $0.9B (midpoint +$0.9B) | Raised |
| Leverage Ratio Midpoint | FY 2026 | ~4.0x | ~4.1x | +0.1x | Lowered |
Reaffirmed unchanged this quarter: Adjusted EBITDA ($8.05 billion to $8.35 billion), Maintenance CapEx ($850 million to $950 million), Dividend ($2.10 annualized)
Other KPIs
Q1 FY2026| Segment | Q1 FY2026 |
|---|---|
| Adjusted EBITDA | $2,254 million |
| Available Funds from Operations (AFFO) | $1,770 million |
| Dividend Coverage Ratio | 2.76x |
| Debt-to-Adjusted EBITDA | 3.61x |
| Transco Avg Daily Transportation Volumes | 16.0 MMdth |
| Northeast G&P Gathering Volumes | 4.01 Bcf/d (consolidated), 6.79 Bcf/d (non-consolidated) |
| West Gathering Volumes | 6.37 Bcf/d |
| Cash Flow from Operations | $1,603 million |
Management tone
Q2 "golden age of gas" urgency → Q3 build-out with supply chain locked through 2030 → Q4 long-term algorithm reset to 10%+ CAGR → Q1 "intersection of incredible potential and the energy required to achieve it"
Project commercialization velocity moved from a deliberate cadence to a single-quarter sprint. Two quarters ago, supply chain was framed as locked through 2030. Last quarter, Socrates the Younger and the Aquila/Apollo upsizing were positioned as a multi-quarter pipeline. This quarter, management put a number on the velocity: "In the first quarter alone, we sanctioned roughly 700 million cubic feet per day of new expansion projects" and commercialized three new major projects plus upsized a fourth. NEO arrives as the fifth major power innovation project at 682 MW. Four transactions in a single quarter signals the demand environment has shifted from "we'll commercialize as projects mature" to a sustained sanctioning cadence — and is the direct justification for the $900M capex raise.
Long-term EBITDA framing escalated from 10%+ CAGR commitment to "historic earnings growth in 28 and beyond". A quarter ago, the 10%+ EBITDA CAGR through 2030 was the reveal. This quarter, the contracted-business CAGR component was disclosed as having moved from 8% (at the February analyst day) to 9% one quarter later, with management framing the overall trajectory as conservative and using the word "historic" to describe 2028+ growth. Spiro Donis at Citi got the explicit confirmation that incremental projects could push above the 10%+ target. The locked-in growth rate climbing 100bps in one quarter is the cleanest tell that the analyst day target sits below where management believes the print will land.
Natural gas narrative reframed from baseload utility to data-center infrastructure platform. Last quarter introduced power innovation as a core earnings driver. This quarter goes further: "we are at the intersection of incredible potential and the energy required to achieve it" and management's repeated tying of every new project — NEO, Atlas, Aristotle, Silver Spur — to data center power demand. The Atlas project in particular (~$50M capex converting customer backup diesel to natural gas generation using pipeline compressibility as storage) signals management is now productizing the legacy asset base for AI-era use cases rather than just expanding it.
Leverage discipline reframed from constraint to financing optionality with a deadline. Last quarter, the 4.0x guide was positioned as the upper end of the target range with partner capital as a release valve. This quarter, leverage moved to 4.1x and management explicitly acknowledged: "the balance sheet leverage tightness is primarily an issue for 26 and 27 before the historic earnings growth we expect in 28 and beyond... we're preserving multiple options to manage leverage." The new framing — leverage tightness as a finite 24-month problem solved by earnings inflection plus partnership recycling — concedes the issue while committing to specific financing disclosures "in the next couple of months." This is materially more concrete than last quarter's hand-wave at "partner capital."
Q2 EBITDA expectations explicitly walked down ahead of the print. New this quarter: management flagged "seasonally lower EBITDA results in 2Q before resuming sequential growth through the second half." For a company that has been guiding non-seasonal, the explicit Q2 caution is unusual — and looks like deliberate expectation management ahead of a quarter where capex commitments will weigh on the leverage ratio before H2 commissioning catches up.
Recurring themes management leaned on this quarter:
Risks management surfaced:
Q&A highlights
Julian Dumlin-Smith · Jefferies
Asked about cadence of the six gigawatt backlog, whether it has been replenished after NEO, timeline for materialization, and creative financing solutions being evaluated for power innovation projects given temporary leverage above target.
Management stated they would not focus on percentages but emphasized robust backlog. They are layering projects considering execution, steady growth, equipment/supply chain availability, and balance sheet discipline. Leverage temporarily above 3.5-4x target due to five high-quality power projects, but 2028 will see enormous earnings growth resetting leverage capacity. Multiple financing options available including attractive partnership structures around power innovation projects that recycle capital while retaining strategic/operational roles. Specific financing plans to be detailed in coming months.
Puneet Satish · Wells Fargo
Asked about redundant capacity levels for power projects (noting Socrates at ~50%) and whether this is evolving with NEO and newer projects, and about Silver Spur expansion opportunities in the Rockies and Northwest region.
Management stated they are seeing more efficient asset combinations while still learning from Socrates commissioning and expect to prove up efficiency gains. Team is applying lessons learned from Socrates, Aquila, and Apollo to new projects. Silver Spur represents first phase of broader Rockies Columbia Connector expansion originally announced; Idaho market was mature and ready. Still progressing discussions with customers in Washington and Oregon for second phase potential later this year.
Spiro Donis · Citi
Asked about growth cadence relative to analyst day guidance, specifically where 8% locked-in CAGR stands now and whether incremental projects take growth above the 10% CAGR target for 2025-2030.
Management confirmed 10%+ CAGR targets for EBITDA and EPS through 2030 remain on track. The 8% CAGR from contracted business in February has now increased to 9% CAGR with newly announced projects. Focused on three areas: project execution on current projects (going well), winning new opportunities from robust commercial backlog, and driving value from legacy businesses (viewed as conservative). Overall growth trajectory feels conservative.
Jean Ann Salisbury · Bank of America
Asked whether Marcellus Gathering expansion is driven by pull-through from power/behind-the-meter projects, and broader question about competitive advantages in power projects beyond Ohio and Utah.
Marcellus expansion not directly tied to power projects but rather organic producer customer growth. Power projects leverage multiple competitive advantages: footprint through Sequent marketing platform providing capacity access on every major U.S. pipeline; virtual and physical footprint enabling projects nationwide; Aristotle pipeline designed as 'energy artery' for data center corridor expansion; West facilities designed to serve multiple projects. Management indicated ability to touch most data center hubs via combination of physical footprint and Sequent platform.
John McKay · Goldman Sachs
Asked about relative competitive advantages in behind-the-meter space against new entrants, specifically regarding balance of plant and comprehensive solutions beyond just turbine provision; also asked about Atlas project specifics.
Competitive advantage stems from unique full value chain: Sequent footprint, gathering/processing touching all producers, transmission touching all major utilities enabling integrated solutions. Not just providing turbines/sites but comprehensive energy infrastructure. Atlas project specifically converts customer backup diesel generation to natural gas using pipeline compressibility as storage, ~$50M capex with redundancy. Proving up natural gas as reliable backup with lower emissions, leveraging pipeline flexibility. Solutions include turbines of various sizes, battery storage, load following capabilities for AI loads and grid protection.
Answers to last quarter's watch list
What to watch into next quarter
Q2 EBITDA print vs. the explicit "seasonally lower" guide — management telegraphed a sequential Q2 dip ahead of H2 acceleration; watch whether the print clears the implied $1.95–2.05B run-rate that keeps the full year in the upper half of the $8.05–8.35B band, and how aggressively management raises the formal midpoint after H1.
Power project financing structure announcement — management committed to disclosing specific financing plans "in the next couple of months," likely involving JV/partnership recycling on power innovation projects; watch the structure, the implied capital recycled, and whether it resets leverage back toward 4.0x or below.
Northeast G&P growth trajectory — segment EBITDA grew just +1.9% YoY in Q1, with rich-gas strength offset by dry-gas volume declines; watch whether Marcellus producer activity reaccelerates (the ~700 MMcf/d of Q1-sanctioned G&P expansions should help) or whether this becomes a structural offset to Transmission strength.
Locked-in CAGR progression beyond 9% — the contracted-business CAGR has moved from 8% (February analyst day) to 9% (Q1); watch whether continued project commercialization in Q2 pushes the locked-in number to 10%+, which would functionally pre-empt the 2030 target without speculative volumes.
NEO and Silver Spur Phase 2 commercial milestones — NEO is targeting early-2030 in-service at a five-times build multiple; Silver Spur Phase 2 discussions with Washington and Oregon customers were flagged for "later this year." Watch for FID, named customers, or open-season announcements as gates on the next leg of the capex bump.
Sources
- Williams Companies Q1 2026 Earnings Press Release, SEC Filing — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/107263/000010726326000015/wmb_20260331xer.htm
- Williams Companies Q1 2026 Earnings Call Prepared Remarks and Q&A (transcript excerpts referenced in extraction)
Get the next brief, free.
We publish analyst-grade earnings briefs the same day or morning after every call — headline numbers, segment KPIs, Q&A highlights, and tone analysis. Free during beta.
This is not investment advice.