tapebrief

AZO · Q1 2026 Earnings

Bullish

AutoZone

Reported December 9, 2025

30-second summary

30-second take: Domestic commercial accelerated for a third straight quarter — from 12.5% in Q4 to 14.5% — and management raised the FY26 store-opening guide from 325–350 (Americas only) to 350–360 global, lifted CapEx from ~$1.5B to ~$1.6B, and bumped the Mega Hub floor from 25–30 to "at least 30." Q1 revenue rose 8.2% YoY to $4.63B with gross margin at 51.0% and operating margin at 16.9%; the LIFO drag is now guided to ~$60M for each of Q2, Q3, and Q4 — well below the $80–85M/quarter Q2–Q4 trajectory management implied last quarter, taking the full back-half LIFO load to ~$180M vs. the prior ~$240–255M implied. The bullish posture from Q4 has hardened into an upward revision of every disclosed FY26 growth lever.

Headline numbers

EPS

Q1 FY2026

$31.04

Revenue

Q1 FY2026

$4.63B

+8.2% YoY

Gross margin

Q1 FY2026

51.0%

Free cash flow

Q1 FY2026

$0.63B

Operating margin

Q1 FY2026

16.9%

Key financials

Q1 FY2026
MetricQ1 FY2026YoYQ4 FY2025QoQ
Revenue$4.63B+8.2%$6.24B-25.8%
EPS$31.04$48.71-36.3%
Gross margin51.0%51.5%-50bps
Operating margin16.9%19.2%-230bps
Free cash flow$0.63B$0.51B+23.3%

Guidance

Guidance is issued for both next quarter and the full year. Both may appear below.

Actuals vs prior guidance

MetricPeriodPrior guideActualΔResult
Interest ExpenseQ1 FY2026$112 million rangeMet
Tax RateQ1 FY2026approximately 23.2%Met
LIFO ChargeQ1 FY2026approximately $120 millionMet
FX Impact - EPSQ1 FY2026$0.38 per share benefitMet

New guidance

MetricPeriodGuideYoY
Store OpeningsQ2 FY202665 to 70 stores globally
Interest ExpenseQ2 FY2026$114 million
Tax RateQ2 FY2026approximately 22.5%
LIFO ChargeQ2 FY2026$60 million
LIFO Impact on EPSQ2 FY2026$2.70 per share

Changes to prior guidance

MetricPeriodPrior guideNew guideΔResult
Store Openings
FY2026
325 to 350 net new stores (Americas)350 to 360 net new storesWidened and broadened from Americas-only to global; midpoint raised from 337.5 to 355, +17.5 stores at midpointRaised
CapEx Investment
FY2026
approximately $1.5 billionnearly $1.6 billion+$100M (~6.7% increase)Raised
Mega Hub Openings
FY2026
25 to 30 locationsat least 30 locationsRaised floor from 25–30 range to at least 30; implies minimum 30 vs prior midpoint of 27.5Raised

Segment performance

Q1 FY2026
SegmentQ1 FY2026YoY
Domestic Commercial$1.292B+14.5%

Platform metrics

Q1 FY2026
SegmentQ1 FY2026
Same Store Sales - Total Company5.5%
Same Store Sales - Domestic4.8%
Same Store Sales - International (Constant Currency)3.7%
Domestic Commercial Growth14.5%
Average Sales per Program per Week$17.5K
Total Store Count7,710
Net New Stores Opened53

Profitability

Q1 FY2026
SegmentQ1 FY2026
Adjusted Debt to EBITDAR2.5x

Management tone

Narrative arc: Q3 FY25 "best days ahead" → Q4 FY25 "deploy capital behind the conviction" → Q1 FY26 "raise the conviction further."

Commercial moved from "this is the run rate" to "structural share-gain machine." Q3 FY25 celebrated 10.7% as the first double-digit quarter since FY23. Q4 treated 12.5% as the new baseline. This quarter at 14.5%, management dropped any reference to historical context and framed commercial as the durable share-gain engine: "These initiatives are delivering share gains and give us confidence as we move further into FY26." The cadence — three consecutive sequential accelerations — has shifted the question from "is the inflection real" to "how high does this run."

International escalated from "bullish" to "bullish despite the headwind." Q3 introduced "bullish" on international. Q4 paired it with a capital commitment. This quarter management held the bullish framing even as international constant-currency comps decelerated almost in half (7.2% → 3.7%) on Mexico macro: "We're bullish on international being an attractive and meaningful contributor to AutoZone's future sales and operating profit growth." The willingness to hold the language through a decelerating quarter is the conviction tell — management is treating Mexico softness as macro noise, not a structural reset.

SG&A posture sharpened from "investing opportunistically" to "purposefully overinvesting." Through FY25 management framed SG&A growth as a necessary cost of growth. This quarter the language hardened: "We've been purposefully investing in SG&A in order to capitalize on opportunities to grow our business now and in the near future." The word "purposefully" — and the explicit acknowledgement in Q&A that SG&A will outpace sales through the store-ramp period — signals management is no longer apologetic about the operating-margin compression that comes with the build phase.

Tariff narrative quietly recovered. Q4 was the first quarter where AZO's prior "fully offset, no material margin impact" claim broke down — the $98M Q1 LIFO charge was the explicit cost of that walk-back, though it came in below the ~$120M guide. This quarter the framing improved: LIFO is now guided at ~$60M for each of Q2, Q3, and Q4 — below the Q1 layer and well below the $80–85M Q2–Q4 trajectory Lasser extracted on the Q4 call. Management credits both the IEPA tariff rollback and the vendor-mitigation playbook — and in doing so, partially restores the "we manage through tariffs" narrative without explicitly reclaiming it.

Store-build cadence escalated from "aggressive" to "aggressive and accelerating annually." Q4 introduced the 500-stores-annually-by-FY28 target. This quarter management widened the FY26 guide from 325–350 Americas to 350–360 global and bumped CapEx to ~$1.6B: "We expect to continue to increase our new store opening pace through the end of fiscal 2028 when we reach a total of 500 stores open annually." The annual ramp framing — not just the FY28 endpoint — is the meaningful tonal shift. This is now a multi-year capital plan with explicit step-up assumptions, not a single-year acceleration.

Recurring themes management leaned on this quarter:

Domestic commercial acceleration and market share gainsAggressive store growth acceleration including Mega Hubs deploymentInternational expansion momentum despite macro headwinds in MexicoDIY resilience driven by aging car park and macro tailwindsStrategic capital investment in distribution centers and supply chainOperational execution and speed of delivery improvements

Risks management surfaced:

Foreign exchange volatility (noted tailwind this quarter but potential headwind)Mexico macroeconomic slowdown affecting international comp growthTariff-driven LIFO charges continuing through FY26 ($60M per quarter expected)Weather variability impacting seasonal sales comparisonsIntegration risks from accelerated store opening pace

Q&A highlights

Brett Jordan · Jeffries

Store maturation timeline, SG&A investment requirements for new stores, and distribution center expansion plans for domestic and international growth

New stores mature over 4-5 years with predictable ramp. Two points of SG&A growth tied to new stores and commercial program acceleration, continuing until 500 global stores by FY28. Supply Chain 2030 investments mostly complete in U.S.; Mexico expansion finishing March/April; Brazil bringing distribution in-house.

4-5 year store maturation timeline~2 percentage points SG&A growth from new stores and commercial programs500 stores globally expected by FY28300 mega hubs target with 100 in pipeline

Zayn Grokhan · UBS

Sustainability of comp momentum as comparisons tighten in Q3/Q4, and relationship between SG&A growth outpacing sales growth and gross margin recovery needed to return to 19%+ operating margins

Management expects comp growth to remain relatively stable, potentially flattening slightly but continuing market share gains. SG&A will slightly outpace sales as stores ramp, then align with sales as stores mature. Operating margin model: current 17%+ gap basis plus 140bps LIFO adds back to ~20% operating model on larger store base.

Comps expected stable with potential moderation but continued market share gainsSG&A to slightly outpace sales growth through ramp period, then align with sales140 basis points LIFO benefit in current model~20% operating margin achievable on larger store base without requiring gross margin recovery

Bharath Rao · J.P. Morgan

DIY sequential slowdown drivers - weather, government shutdown impact, and underlying demand deterioration assessment

Slowdown in middle 4 weeks of quarter driven by weather comps (lack of cold snap, no hurricane reoccurrence vs. prior year) and not underlying demand deterioration. No meaningful government shutdown impact mentioned. Demand characterized as stable with wobble being timing-related.

Weather-driven wobble in middle 4-week segment of quarterHurricane benefit in prior year did not reoccurCold snap comparison unfavorable vs. prior year in northern marketsNo material customer demand deterioration observed

Shervin · Truist

LIFO charge expectations lower than anticipated - whether from tariff reduction (IEPA rollback) or operational mitigation efforts, and impact on inflation and same-skew expectations

Lower LIFO impact from two factors: (1) vendor cost negotiations, sourcing diversification, and retail price increases per existing playbook; (2) IEPA tariff rollback from 20% to 10% on China imports. Expecting continued tariff cost increases through Q3, moderating in Q4. Merchants have been executing tariff mitigation strategies since 2016-17 with improving results.

IEPA tariffs reduced from 20% to 10% on ChinaTariff inflation expected through Q3, moderating in Q4 and summerVendor negotiation, sourcing diversification, retail price raises ongoingMerchants executing multi-source, multi-country diversification strategy for years

Ariana · Citi

Merged margin performance in quarter and outlook for fiscal year; drivers offsetting 30-40 basis point mix headwind from faster-growing commercial business

Strong merged margin quarter with 9bps underlying improvement ex-LIFO. Commercial mix shift drove 34bps drag. Merchant actions offsetting this through private label expansion, alternate sourcing, new brands, and house brand growth. Playbook continues with intensity.

+9 basis points underlying gross margin ex-LIFO34 basis points drag from commercial mix shift30-40 basis point commercial mix headwind expected to continueMerchant playbook: alternate sources, new brands, private label/house brand expansion

Answers to last quarter's watch list

Q1 gross margin within ~150bps of prior year given the ~$120M LIFO guide — Resolved positively on the LIFO line, mixed on the headline. Q1 gross margin came in at 51.0%, down 203bps YoY — wider than the ~150bps watch threshold — but the LIFO charge of $98M came in below the ~$120M guide, with +9bps underlying improvement ex-LIFO and a 34bps commercial mix drag. The drag was contained inside management's prior framing rather than exceeding it. Status: Resolved positively on the LIFO mechanics, headline GM decline came in wider than the watch threshold.
DIY traffic recovering above -1% in Q1 vs. the -1.9% Q4 pace — Continue monitoring. Management acknowledged a mid-quarter DIY slowdown attributed to weather comps (no cold snap, no hurricane reoccurrence) but did not disclose a specific Q1 DIY traffic figure. Domestic SSS held at +4.8% (flat vs. Q4), suggesting ticket strength continues to mask traffic weakness.
Continue monitoring
Pace of net new store openings against the 325–350 FY26 guide — Resolved negatively in absolute terms, resolved positively in management framing. Q1 delivered 53 net new stores, well below the ~88/quarter pace required for the original 350 midpoint. However, management raised the FY guide to 350–360 (global) and guided 65–70 globally for Q2, implying a sharp back-half acceleration. The Q1 print itself trailed the run-rate.
Continue monitoring
Commercial growth sustaining in the 10–13% range against tougher comps — Resolved positively. Commercial accelerated to 14.5%, above the watch-list range and the third consecutive sequential acceleration. The conviction trade is now whether commercial holds at low-teens, not whether double-digit growth is sustainable.
Resolved positively
Confirmation of the implied full-year LIFO trajectory ($120M Q1 guide, $80–85M/quarter Q2–Q4) — Resolved positively. Q1 came in at $98M (below the ~$120M guide), and LIFO is now guided at ~$60M for each of Q2, Q3, and Q4 — materially below the $80–85M Q2–Q4 trajectory implied last quarter. The full back-half LIFO load is now ~$180M vs. the prior ~$240–255M implied. Management credits the IEPA tariff rollback from 20% to 10% on China plus vendor mitigation.
Resolved positively
Mega Hub opening cadence against the 25–30 FY26 target and Mega-Hub-specific comp disclosure — Resolved positively on cadence, not resolved on disclosure. The Mega Hub guide was raised from 25–30 to "at least 30" with management citing an "exceptionally strong" pipeline and a 300-Mega-Hub target with 100 in the pipeline. Mega-Hub-specific comp productivity was again not disclosed. Status: Resolved positively (on cadence).

What to watch into next quarter

Whether Q2 net store openings hit the 65–70 global guide (vs. 45 PY) — the 53-store Q1 print means Q2 needs to deliver to keep the 350–360 FY guide credible

Whether commercial growth holds in the low-teens range or whether 14.5% marks the cyclical peak as comparisons stiffen — management explicitly hedged on Q2 in Q&A ("relatively stable with possible mild moderation")

Whether international constant-currency comps recover from +3.7% or whether Mexico macro weakness persists — the bullish international narrative has now held through one decelerating quarter, but a second would test it

Whether the ~$60M/quarter LIFO run-rate holds for Q3 and Q4 as currently guided, or whether tariff pressure forces an upward revision — management framed tariff inflation as moderating in Q4, so any upward LIFO revision would invalidate the recovery narrative

Whether DIY traffic, when management ultimately discloses it, has stabilized above the -1.9% Q4 pace — the share-gain narrative continues to require traffic to bend back

Whether management discloses Mega-Hub-specific comp productivity for the second consecutive quarter where it was asked — sustained non-disclosure into a 300-Mega-Hub target raises questions about per-unit economics

Sources

  1. AutoZone Q1 FY2026 press release, filed with SEC, 2025-12-09 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/866787/000117184325007831/exh_991.htm
  2. AutoZone Q1 FY2026 earnings call prepared remarks and Q&A (transcript excerpts as provided)
  3. AutoZone Q4 FY2025 brief (Tapebrief, 2025-09-23) — for guidance and tone comparison
  4. AutoZone Q3 FY2025 brief (Tapebrief, 2025-05-27) — for narrative arc

Get the next brief, free.

We publish analyst-grade earnings briefs the same day or morning after every call — headline numbers, segment KPIs, Q&A highlights, and tone analysis. Free during beta.

This is not investment advice.