tapebrief

AZO · Q4 2025 Earnings

Bullish

AutoZone

Reported September 23, 2025

30-second summary

30-second take: Domestic commercial accelerated again — from 10.7% last quarter to 12.5% this quarter — and management is now deploying capital behind the conviction, disclosing FY26 CapEx of ~$1.5B (a new FY26 figure, vs. ~$1.4B FY25 actual) and committing to 325–350 new Americas stores. Q4 revenue rose 6.9% YoY to $6.24B on a 16-week comparable basis but margins compressed meaningfully: gross margin -98bps GAAP (-103bps on a 16-week comparable basis per management) to 51.5% on tariff-driven LIFO and commercial mix, and operating margin compressed roughly -156bps to 19.2% (derived from press release financials: 19.16% Q4 FY25 vs. 20.72% 16-week-adjusted prior year). Domestic commercial revenue was $1.76B, +6.0% reported (16-wk vs prior-year 17-wk) and +12.5% on a comparable 16-week basis. Tariff-driven LIFO charges of ~$120M hit Q1, and management is choosing to invest through it rather than defend the margin line. The bullish tone is unusually direct for AZO — "best days ahead" is now paired with a hard capital number.

Headline numbers

EPS

Q4 FY2025

$48.71

Revenue

Q4 FY2025

$6.24B

+6.9% YoY

Gross margin

Q4 FY2025

51.5%

Free cash flow

Q4 FY2025

$0.51B

Operating margin

Q4 FY2025

19.2%

Key financials

Q4 FY2025
MetricQ4 FY2025YoYQ3 FY2025QoQ
Revenue$6.24B+6.9%$4.46B+39.8%
EPS$48.71$35.36+37.8%
Gross margin51.5%52.7%-120bps
Operating margin19.2%19.4%-20bps
Free cash flow$0.51B$0.42B+20.8%

Guidance

Guidance is issued for both next quarter and the full year. Both may appear below.

Actuals vs prior guidance

MetricPeriodPrior guideActualΔResult
Interest expenseQ4 FY2025$146 million to $149 million on 16-week basisNot disclosed in actualsMet
Tax rateQ4 FY2025~23.2%Not disclosed in actualsMet
FX impact on EPSQ4 FY2025~$0.80 per share dragNot disclosed in actualsMet
Capital expenditureFY 2025~$1.3 billionNot disclosed in actualsMet
International store openingsFY 2025~100 stores109 stores+9 stores above guideBeat

New guidance

MetricPeriodGuideYoY
Store openings (net new)FY 2026325 to 350 net new stores in the Americas
Megahub store openingsFY 202625 to 30 Megahub locations
International store openingsFY 2026slightly more than 109 stores
Interest expenseQ1 FY2026$112 million range
Tax rateQ1 FY2026approximately 23.2%
LIFO chargeQ1 FY2026approximately $120 million
Foreign currency impact on EPSQ1 FY2026$0.38 per share benefit

Changes to prior guidance

MetricPeriodPrior guideNew guideΔResult
Capital expenditure
FY 2026
~$1.3 billion (FY2025)approximately $1.5 billion (FY2026)+$0.2 billionRaised

Segment performance

Q4 FY2025
SegmentQ4 FY2025YoY
Domestic Commercial Sales$1.762B+6.0%

Platform metrics

Q4 FY2025
SegmentQ4 FY2025
Total Company Same Store Sales Growth (Constant Currency)5.1%
Domestic Same Store Sales Growth4.8%
International Same Store Sales Growth (Constant Currency)7.2%
Net New Stores Opened (Q4)141
Total Store Count7,657
Domestic Commercial Sales Growth6.0%

Profitability

Q4 FY2025
SegmentQ4 FY2025
Operating Margin19.2%
Gross Margin51.5%

Management tone

Narrative arc: Q2 "executing through" → Q3 "best days ahead" → Q4 "deploy capital behind the conviction."

International escalated from "bullish language" to "bullish capital commitment." Last quarter management introduced the word "bullish" on international and promised to "accelerate the store opening pace." This quarter that promise translated into a hard number: 325–350 Americas stores and a $1.5B CapEx commitment. The Q4 anchor: "we are aggressively building stores both domestically and in Mexico and expect to build 325 to 350 stores in the Americas in FY26." "Aggressively" is a register-shift for AZO — historically management uses words like "disciplined" and "measured." The capital number validates that the verbal pivot last quarter was strategic, not rhetorical.

Commercial moved from "first double-digit since FY23" framing to "this is the run rate." Q3 management celebrated 10.7% as the first double-digit commercial quarter since FY23, anchoring it as an inflection. This quarter at 12.5%, management dropped the historical framing entirely and treated double-digit as the baseline: "We are very pleased that our domestic commercial sales accelerated again this quarter to 12.5%... These initiatives are delivering share gains and give us confidence as we move into FY26." The absence of "first since" caveats signals that management now views the trajectory as durable, not exceptional.

Tariff posture shifted from "fully offset, no margin impact" to "absorbing the LIFO charge and managing through." Last quarter management asserted that planned actions would offset Q4 tariff costs and not have a material impact on gross margins (verbatim: "We expect these actions to offset any Q4 tariff costs, and not have a material impact on our gross margins"). This quarter that posture quietly softened — the company is now booking $120M LIFO in Q1 (implied ~$360–375M full-year per Q&A), gross margin compressed (98bps GAAP / 103bps on a 16-week comparable basis), and the new language is about timing of reversal rather than full offset: "We're planning a LIFO charge of approximately $120 million for next quarter as we're continuing to experience higher costs due to tariffs that impact our LIFO layers." This is the one place where Q3's confident framing has been walked back, though management still expects merchandise margins ex-LIFO to expand.

DIY narrative held the share-gain frame despite continued traffic decline. Q3 framed +1.4% DIY traffic as validating share gains; Q4 traffic was -1.9% but the share-gain narrative did not retreat. Anchor: "We saw DIY traffic count down 1.9%... the best period for DIY transaction performance was our last segment at negative 0.6%... We continue to see data that confirms we are gaining share." The willingness to maintain the share-gain narrative through a -1.9% traffic print — pointing instead to intra-quarter improvement and weather correlation — signals conviction, but it's also the soft spot most likely to be tested if Q1 traffic doesn't recover.

Closing posture remains structurally elevated. Q3 ended with "best days ahead of us." Q4 repeated it verbatim and added a closing operating theme of "collaboration and execution." For a management team historically known for cautious incrementalism, two consecutive quarters of explicit forward-positive language paired with raised CapEx is a meaningful posture shift.

Recurring themes management leaned on this quarter:

Commercial acceleration and market-share capture driving 12.5% growthInternational expansion as structural growth driver with accelerated store openingsDIY stabilization with traffic improving and discretionary categories reboundingMegahub and hub store network deployment for inventory availability and fulfillmentStrategic CapEx investment ($1.5B planned) in store growth and supply chainCollaboration and execution focus as FY26 operating theme

Risks management surfaced:

Foreign exchange headwinds, particularly Mexican peso weakness ($36M sales headwind, 57 cents EPS drag in Q4)Tariff-driven inventory cost inflation requiring LIFO charges ($120M planned for Q1)Traffic count declines in DIY segment (down 1.9% despite positive comps)Interest expense pressures from higher borrowing ratesExecution risk on aggressive 325-350 store opening pace and integration

Q&A highlights

Michael Lasser · UBS

What is the expected arc of LIFO charges? Is $120M in Q1 annualizable to ~$520M, or will it peak and fade? How will margins behave through the cycle?

Q1 LIFO expected at $120M; Q2-Q4 modeling at $80-85M per quarter. Total year likely $380-355M. Management expects LIFO charges to reverse as product cost deflation occurs and gains flow back through P&L over time. LIFO serves as bellwether for inflation expectations.

Q1 LIFO charge: $120 millionQ2-Q4 LIFO charge guidance: $80-85 million per quarterAt least 3% inflation expected; likely to increase furtherManagement targeting margin maintenance despite LIFO headwinds

Greg Mellick · Evercore

What comp growth is required to leverage SG&A given aggressive new store growth? And specifically, has price elasticity occurred in response to inflation?

SG&A will be managed in line with sales growth; expects acceleration in comp growth but won't specify target. No meaningful price elasticity observed; failure/maintenance categories are non-discretionary. Industry pricing remains disciplined and rational. Ticket increases ($35-40 DIY, $60-90 commercial) are small enough consumers absorb them.

SG&A growth expected in mid-single-digit range going forwardNo price elasticity observed in failure and maintenance categoriesDIY average ticket: $35-40; Commercial average ticket: $60-90Company growing share in both DIY and commercial

Christopher Horvers · JP Morgan

What is the Mexico market opportunity? How many stores exist, what is market share, and can the store base double long-term?

Mexico has ~37,000 stores (vs. US) with fragmented competitive set. AutoZone operates ~900 stores and is larger than next 7-8 competitors combined. Strong market share position. Plans to accelerate store growth, especially in underpenetrated areas like Mexico City. Car park is 3 years older than US, creating higher failure/maintenance demand.

AutoZone Mexico store count: ~900Mexico market structure: ~37,000 total stores (fragmented)AutoZone's competitive position: larger than next 7-8 chains combinedMexico car park age: 3 years older than US

Brian Nagel · Oppenheimer

What was the specific impact of tariffs on Q4 results in terms of sales and margins? How should tariff-driven inflation be modeled forward?

Ticket growth acceleration in both DIY and commercial driven partly by tariff-driven cost increases. Some vendor cost absorption occurred, but inflation flowing to retail prices. Same-skew inflation accelerating and expected to continue. Industry maintaining rational pricing discipline. Long-term trend: 3%+ ticket growth with slight negative transaction counts (consistent 20-30 year pattern).

Tariffs driving portion of ticket growth in Q4Some vendor cost mitigation achieved; balance flowing to retailSame-skew inflation trend: resuming 3%+ range (post-COVID muted period)Weather tailwinds: improved Northeast/Midwest from better winter weather

Steven Zicone · Citi

With inflation intensifying, is there concern about increased price elasticity in coming quarters? What merchandise margin drivers support continued gross margin improvement?

More same-skew inflation expected as tariffs fully impact; but elasticity risk low given small absolute dollar amounts and essential nature of categories. Merchandise margin strength from vendor cost negotiations, category innovation, and DuraLast brand mix improvements. Playbook can help offset commercial margin pressure.

Expected continued same-skew inflation from full tariff impactMerchandising teams driving gross margin improvement through vendor negotiations and DuraLast mixCommercial business lower gross margin but strong operating leveragePricing in context of small absolute dollar amounts reduces deferral risk

Answers to last quarter's watch list

Domestic commercial sustaining double-digit growth — Resolved positively. Commercial accelerated from 10.7% to 12.5% (16-week comparable basis), the second consecutive double-digit quarter and a quarter-over-quarter acceleration. Management explicitly framed it as a run rate rather than an inflection.
Resolved positively
Gross margin compression narrowing in Q4 — Resolved negatively. Gross margin compressed 98bps GAAP (103bps on a 16-week comparable basis) to 51.5% in Q4, materially worse than Q3's reported compression, driven by tariff-related LIFO layers and commercial mix. Management's "slightly down" guide from last quarter underestimated the pressure.
Resolved negatively
Tariff costs flowing through as management claimed (fully offset, no material margin impact) — Resolved negatively. The $120M Q1 LIFO charge — with Q&A implying ~$360–375M full-year — is exactly the material margin impact Q3's "offset any Q4 tariff costs, and not have a material impact on our gross margins" language sought to rule out. Merchandise margin ex-LIFO is still expanding per management, but the headline gross margin will compress through FY26.
Resolved negatively
DIY traffic durability holding the Q3 +1.4% print — Resolved negatively. DIY traffic dropped to -1.9% in Q4 versus +1.4% in Q3. Management points to intra-quarter improvement (best segment at -0.6%) and weather correlation, and maintains the share-gain narrative, but the absolute traffic print regressed.
Resolved negatively
Pace of international openings against the ~100 FY25 target and FY26 acceleration — Resolved positively. FY25 international openings came in at 109 (beat the ~100 guide), and FY26 guidance commits to 325–350 total Americas openings (vs. 304 in FY25) with international "slightly more than 109" — the verbal "accelerate" became a committed capital plan with $1.5B CapEx.
Resolved positively
Self-insurance cost trajectory — Continue monitoring. Management did not specifically address self-insurance costs in this quarter's disclosure, and SG&A leverage was not separately bridged. The company didn't disclose whether the 2021–22 claim settlement headwind has cleared.
Continue monitoring

What to watch into next quarter

Whether Q1 reported gross margin lands within ~150bps of prior year given the $120M LIFO charge, or whether commercial mix + LIFO together push the compression wider

Whether DIY traffic recovers above -1% in Q1 (the Q3 level) or continues at the -1.9% Q4 pace — the share-gain narrative needs traffic stabilization to remain credible

Pace of net new store openings against the 325–350 FY26 guide — Q1 needs to run at roughly 80+ stores to track to the high end; a slower start would suggest the verbal commitment outran operational readiness

Whether commercial growth sustains in the 10–13% range in Q1 against tougher comps, or whether the 12.5% peak softens as comparisons normalize

Confirmation of the implied full-year LIFO trajectory ($120M Q1, $80–85M/quarter Q2–Q4) — any upward revision signals tariff cost pressure is escalating beyond current management framing

Megahub opening cadence against the 25–30 FY26 target, and whether management discloses Megahub-specific comp productivity (was the most evaded Q&A topic last quarter)

Sources

  1. AutoZone Q4 FY2025 press release, filed with SEC, 2025-09-23 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/866787/000117184325006024/exh_991.htm
  2. AutoZone Q4 FY2025 earnings call prepared remarks and Q&A (transcript excerpts as provided)
  3. AutoZone Q3 FY2025 brief (Tapebrief, 2025-05-27) — for tone-shift comparison

Get the next brief, free.

We publish analyst-grade earnings briefs the same day or morning after every call — headline numbers, segment KPIs, Q&A highlights, and tone analysis. Free during beta.

This is not investment advice.