LLY · Q2 2025 Earnings
BullishEli Lilly
Reported August 7, 2025
30-second summary
30-second take: Lilly delivered $15.56B in Q2 FY2025 revenue (+38% YoY), driven by Mounjaro ($5.2B, +68%) and Zepbound ($3.38B, +172%), and raised the midpoint of full-year revenue guidance by $1.5B to $60–62B. Non-GAAP EPS came in at $6.31, with non-GAAP gross margin of 85.0%, non-GAAP performance margin of 45.9%, and reported operating margin of 44.1%. The print sets up the Orforglipron regulatory submission later this year as the next catalyst, with management guiding to a Q4 global submission for chronic weight management on the back of ATTAIN-1 and ATTAIN-2.
Headline numbers
EPS
Q2 FY2025
$6.31
Revenue
Q2 FY2025
$15.56B
+38.0% YoY
Gross margin
Q2 FY2025
84.3%
Operating margin
Q2 FY2025
44.1%
Key financials
Q2 FY2025| Metric | Q2 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.56B | +38.0% |
| EPS | $6.31 | — |
| Gross margin | 84.3% | — |
| Operating margin | 44.1% | — |
Guidance
Prior quarter data unavailable — comparison not possible.
Segment KPIs
Q2 FY2025| Segment | Q2 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Mounjaro | $5.2B | +68.0% |
| Zepbound | $3.38B | +172.0% |
| Verzenio | $1.49B | +12.0% |
Other KPIs
Q2 FY2025| Segment | Q2 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| United States | $10.81B | +38.0% |
| Outside United States | $4.74B | +37.0% |
| Gross Margin (non-GAAP) | 85.0% | — |
| Volume Growth | 42% | — |
| U.S. Volume Growth | 46% | — |
| International Volume Growth | 35% | — |
| R&D Expense as % of Revenue | 21.4% | — |
Management tone
The prepared remarks were not captured in the available transcript material, so cross-quarter tone analysis is not possible this quarter. From the Q&A, management projected high conviction on the commercial incretins franchise (Ricks, Custer, Yufa all on-message about share, pricing discipline, and capacity) and addressed the Orforglipron efficacy positioning constructively via Custer, emphasizing the 27-pound weight loss at the top dose, broader cardiometabolic biomarker improvements, and the convenience/scalability of an oral small molecule.
Q&A highlights
Chris Schott · JPMorgan
How does Orphoglipron's weight loss profile compare to competitors like Novo's semaglutide and Eli Lilly's Zepbound, and where does it fit in the treatment landscape?
Ken Custer highlighted that 27 pounds of weight loss from a once-daily oral pill with improvements in blood pressure, lipids, and inflammatory biomarkers addresses a significant unmet need. Emphasized simplicity of dosing and manufacturing scalability. Noted Orphoglipron is being evaluated across multiple settings including diabetes, sleep apnea, osteoarthritis pain, and weight maintenance therapy.
Seamus Fernandez · Guggenheim
What are management's views on the pricing path for Orphoglipron and the broader GLP-1 market, particularly regarding compounding and how Lilly will maintain pricing discipline?
Dave Ricks emphasized Lilly's philosophy to price to value while noting patient safety concerns with compounding. Indicated expectation of single-digit net pricing erosion on chronic medications while maintaining strong list prices. Noted Lilly will continue direct-to-consumer pricing given coverage gaps. Acknowledged robust 42% total incretins market growth with Lilly growing more than double that rate.
Tim Anderson · Bank of America
Will Canadian generic semaglutide launching in early 2026 create sustained pricing headwinds similar to current compounding issues, given the self-pay channel's price sensitivity?
Ilya Yufa noted strong continued performance of Zepbound in both self-pay and covered markets, with 65% share in new therapy starts for semaglutide. Highlighted growth of 1 million vial TRX in Q2 and recent launch of highest doses. Indicated market is showing health with continued demand for Zepbound's value proposition despite competitive noise from compounders.
Umair Rafat · Evercore
Why does Orphoglipron's placebo-adjusted weight loss (9% ITT) trail Novo's oral semaglutide data (14% ITT) significantly, and should Lilly consider a 45mg cohort given favorable safety?
Dan Skowronski stated the efficacy profile is consistent with what GLP-1 monotherapy can deliver and noted difficulty in cross-trial comparisons given different populations and timing. Indicated this profile is appropriate for real-world clinical use and dismissed investor focus on exact comparative numbers as not translating to clinical practice.
Akash Tawari · Jeffreys
Is Lilly willing to launch new products at price parity between US and Europe, and what is management's confidence in achieving a bespoke pricing solution with the administration?
Dave Ricks acknowledged long-term need to rebalance US-Europe pricing but emphasized structural challenges requiring trade tools and gross-to-net deflation. Indicated new product on-ramps could enable gradual harmonization if European reimbursement rates rise and US system changes. Referenced ongoing constructive engagement with administration but noted complexity in sudden changes.
What to watch into next quarter
Orforglipron NDA submission — management has guided to a Q4 global regulatory submission for chronic weight management based on ATTAIN-1 and the upcoming ATTAIN-2 readout; confirmation of filing date and indication scope is the single biggest catalyst into Q3 print.
Zepbound TRX trajectory — Q2 generated over 1M vial TRX, with cash-pay vials representing ~20% of total Zepbound TRX and >35% of new Rx; watch whether the 12.5mg and 15mg dose launches drive continued sequential growth and whether the ~65% branded anti-obesity new-therapy-start share holds, particularly against the July CVS formulary exclusion headwind management has already flagged for Q3.
Performance margin trajectory — FY guide of 43.0–44.5% non-GAAP sits below Q2's 45.9% non-GAAP performance margin; watch whether incretin manufacturing scale-up costs and incremental commercial spend compress that in H2.
Pricing erosion on chronic GLP-1s — Ricks guided to "single-digit net pricing erosion"; watch realized net price disclosure and whether Canadian generic semaglutide launch timing pulls that range wider in early 2026 commentary.
Manufacturing capacity — Lilly produced 1.6x H1 2024 saleable incretin doses in H1 2025 and guided to at least 1.8x H2 2024 in H2 2025; watch the location announcements for the two new U.S. manufacturing facilities expected this quarter.
Sources
- Eli Lilly Q2 2025 earnings press release (SEC Form 8-K exhibit): https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/59478/000005947825000202/q225lillysalesandearningsp.htm
- Eli Lilly Q2 2025 earnings call Q&A (partial transcript)
Get the next brief, free.
We publish analyst-grade earnings briefs the same day or morning after every call — headline numbers, segment KPIs, Q&A highlights, and tone analysis. Free during beta.
This is not investment advice.