tapebrief

WEC · Q1 2026 Earnings

Bullish

WEC Energy Group

Reported May 5, 2026

30-second summary

WEC opened FY2026 with $2.45 non-GAAP EPS on $3.43B revenue (+9.0% YoY), beating consensus by 5.2% on EPS and 0.4% on revenue, and reaffirmed FY2026 GAAP guidance of $5.51–$5.61 — landing in the middle of the 6.5–7% growth corridor management telegraphed last quarter off the $5.17–$5.27 FY2025 base. The substantive news is regulatory: the Wisconsin PSC verbally approved the Very Large Customer tariff on April 24 with ROE of 10.48–10.98% and a 57% equity ratio, removing the binary risk Tapebrief flagged last quarter on ~15% of the future rate base. The five-year capital plan also stepped to $37.5B (+$1B vs the $36.5B disclosed in Q3'25), and Microsoft brought its first Mount Pleasant data center online ahead of schedule.

Headline numbers

EPS

Q1 FY2026

$2.45

+5.2% vs est.

Revenue

Q1 FY2026

$3.43B

+9.0% YoY

+0.4% vs est.

Free cash flow

Q1 FY2026

$0.40B

Operating margin

Q1 FY2026

28.5%

Key financials

Q1 FY2026
MetricQ1 FY2026YoYQ4 FY2025QoQ
Revenue$3.43B+9.0%$2.54B+35.4%
EPS$2.45$1.42+72.5%
Operating margin28.5%17.8%+1066bps
Free cash flow$0.40B

Guidance

FY2026 EPS guidance reaffirmed at $5.51–$5.61 (a material upgrade from prior FY2025 $5.17–$5.27); company initiates Q2 FY2026 EPS guidance ($0.76–$0.82) and quantifies five-year capex plan ($37.5B) while moderating full-year electric sales growth expectation to ~1.5%.

Guidance is issued for the full year only, refreshed each quarter. Prior and new below are the same FY updated this quarter.

New guidance

MetricPeriodGuideYoY
EPS (Next Quarter)Q2 FY2026$0.76 to $0.82+25% to +35% YoY
Electric Sales Growth (Full Year)FY 2026Around 1.5%
Five-year Capital Plan InvestmentFY 2026–FY 2030$37.5 billion

Reaffirmed unchanged this quarter: EPS (Full Year) ($5.51 to $5.61)

Other KPIs

Q1 FY2026
SegmentQ1 FY2026
Small commercial and industrial electricity consumption growth0.7%
Large commercial and industrial electricity consumption growth (ex-iron ore mine)2.7%
Residential electricity use growth0.2%
Weather-normal retail electricity deliveries growth (ex-iron ore mine)1.3%
Weather-normal natural gas deliveries growth (Wisconsin, ex-power generation)-2.1%
Operating margin28.5%
Customers served4.8 million

Management tone

Q2'25 record $28B plan → Q3'25 $36.5B and 7–8% CAGR → Q1'26 VLC settled, plan to $37.5B, execution confidence

The data center buildout has crossed from forward narrative to operating reality. Two quarters ago Vantage and Microsoft were named acreage and gigawatt potential. Last quarter they were anchors in a redrawn capex plan. This quarter management reported a Microsoft data center online ahead of schedule in Mount Pleasant and quantified 2.6 GW of forecasted demand through 2030 in southeastern Wisconsin, with 1.3 GW of Vantage demand layered on top. Microsoft has now purchased more than 2,200 acres in the I-94 corridor; Vantage has signed on for approximately 1,900 acres total, with the initial 670-acre phase under construction. From the call: "Microsoft brought its first data center online in Mount Pleasant ahead of schedule." That is the first hard delivery datapoint in this multi-quarter buildout, and it converts what was credibility risk into execution evidence.

Regulatory risk on the VLC tariff — Tapebrief's #5 watch item from last quarter — has been retired as a binary. In Q3'25 the VLC tariff was framed as the bridge between 11.3% asset base growth and 7–8% EPS growth, with an "early May 2026" order date carrying genuine downside if denied. Management can now state: "the Public Service Commission verbally approved the tariff structure on April 24th... approved the return on equity in the range of 10.48 to 10.98%, and the equity ratio of 57%." The ROE and equity ratio came in at the high end of typical Wisconsin authorizations — not just an approval, but a favorable one. The ~15% of asset base attributable to very large customers by 2030 is now anchored on a known economic framework.

Management confidence vocabulary has stepped up another notch from an already-elevated Q3'25 baseline. Last quarter "we expect to nearly double our asset base" was the high-water mark. This quarter management said "we have a highly high level of confidence in our ability to execute on our capital plan and continue our growth trajectory" — a superlative phrasing that's notably out-of-pattern for regulated utility communications. The shift is from confidence pending regulatory approval to confidence post-approval, which is structurally different.

The growth acceleration language got more specific. Last quarter introduced "acceleration starting in 2028" as a phrase. This quarter management explicitly mapped it to the band: "We expect that growth rate to accelerate to the upper half of the range starting in 2028" — i.e., 7.5–8% from 2028 onward versus the lower end (7–7.5%) in 2026–2027. That's a forward bet that the data center ramp drives a step-function in 2028 earnings, not a smooth compounding line.

One subtle moderation worth flagging: the near-term electric sales growth signal weakened. Last quarter the 2028–2030 sales growth band was raised from 4.5–5% to 6–7%. This quarter management reiterated FY2026 electric sales growth of ~1.5%. The two numbers are consistent (back-end-loaded acceleration), but the 1.5% near-term figure is the floor, not the headline — investors looking for in-year volume re-acceleration should temper that expectation.

Recurring themes management leaned on this quarter:

Data center economic development acceleration in WisconsinVery large customer tariff regulatory approval removes key riskCapital plan execution confidence and acceleration pathwayRegional economic growth foundation for earnings growthEarnings per share growth trajectory to accelerate by 2028Dividend growth consistency (23 consecutive years)

Risks management surfaced:

Weather variance from normal conditions affecting earningsExecution risk on $37.5 billion five-year capital planTiming risks on regulatory approvals for Illinois proceedingsDay-to-day O&M timing reversals expected throughout yearForward equity issuance at uncertain future prices via ATM program

Q&A highlights

Richard Sunderland · Truist Securities

How does the VLC tariff threshold reduction from 500 MW to 100 MW affect current and future customers, and how is it impacting economic development conversations in Wisconsin?

Management confirmed the 100 MW threshold does not affect current customers (Microsoft and Vantage), as no existing customers fall in that 200 MW range. They see potential modest positive impact for smaller data centers and no economic development concerns. The lower threshold demonstrates smaller data centers will pay their full share.

Proposed VLC threshold was 500 MW, reduced to 100 MWNo current customers fall in the 100-200 MW rangeManagement does not anticipate negative impact on economic developmentLower threshold demonstrates full cost allocation transparency

Nick Campanella · Barclays

Can management discuss execution capability on 4-5 GW additional capacity from already-approved sites, supply chain/equipment constraints, and expected announcements in Q3 given VLC finalization?

Management expressed confidence in execution capability to deliver all needed capacity and generation. Noted Q3 will include incremental additions to the plan but avoided specifics on timing and customer amounts, citing ongoing negotiations. Confirmed first Point Beach unit replacement will be in current plan with some funding for 2033 unit.

4-5 GW potential on already-approved/permitted sitesManagement confident in delivery capabilityIncremental capacity expected to be announced in Q3First Point Beach PPA unit (2030) will be in current plan; some funding for 2033 unit

Michael Sullivan · Wolf Research

What is the likelihood of settling the Illinois rate case, and what is the expected cadence for future Illinois rate cases given the pipe retirement program ramp?

Management declined to predict settlement likelihood before seeing testimony, noting Illinois historically has been difficult to settle. However, they cited the recent QIP settlement as a positive step. Regarding cadence, management expects annual rate case filings in Illinois as the pipe retirement program ramps, particularly for 2027-2028 and ongoing.

Illinois rate case filed April 2024 with modest base rate increases: 4.7% (2027) and 4.5% (2028)QIP settlement resolved 12 historical uncollectible cases with support from AG, ICC staff, Citizens Utility BoardPipe replacement program: $200M in 2025, ramping in 2027-2028Expects first testimony from ICC staff by end of day of call

Carly Davenport · Goldman Sachs

What is the status of construction at the Vantage site and timeline to end of 2027 in-service? Are there any transmission approval risks or delays, and what protections exist if timing slips?

Management reported no slippage at Vantage site with bi-weekly meetings. Transmission line approval expected in fall 2024. Noted VLC tariff fixes (nomination basis for transmission, full cost allocation) protect against subsidies and should not cause delays. Confident in execution timeline.

Vantage site: no slippage observed; bi-weekly status meetings ongoingTransmission line approval expected fall 2024VLC tariff transmission fixes: nomination-based, full cost allocation protectionsIn-service date: end of 2027

Paul Fremont · Leidenberg

For Point Beach replacement, should we assume the $2-2.5B per GW cost applies to a gas/renewable mix? Also, regarding non-regulated renewables near end of PTC, what uplift is expected in recontracting and how does this offset PTC expiration?

Management indicated Point Beach replacement will likely be a mix of renewables and CTs or combined cycle, all evaluated annually for cost effectiveness. On non-regulated renewables, they are evaluating safe-harbor repowering for another 10 years of PTCs and expect favorable recontracting economics given current renewable market values are higher than initial contract prices.

Point Beach replacement: $2-2.5B per GW cost estimate; mix of renewables, CTs, and/or combined cycle under evaluationSafe-harbored materials for early PTC-expiring units to enable 10-year repoweringNon-regulated renewable contracts coming due: recontracting values expected higher than initial pricing due to current market conditionsRenewable resource value today more valuable than initial contracting

Answers to last quarter's watch list

CCGT project specifics — Partial progress. Management referenced the Paris race units and Oak Creek combustion turbines coming online in late 2027, providing site and approximate timing. However, a fully scoped CCGT — site, MW capacity, in-service date, capex — was not disclosed on this print. The Q&A indicated incremental plan additions will be detailed on the Q3 call. Status: Continue monitoring
Microsoft Phase 2 / Port Washington optionality conversion — Not converted into the formal plan this quarter. The $37.5B plan represents only a $1B step from the $36.5B figure disclosed in Q3'25, indicating the 2+ GW Port Washington optionality and incremental hyperscaler acreage remain outside the plan. Management did say Q3 "will include incremental additions to the plan" but specifics were withheld pending customer negotiations. Status: Continue monitoring
2026 EPS guidance — Resolved. FY2026 guidance landed at $5.51–$5.61, which represents ~6.6% at the low end ($5.51 vs $5.17) and ~6.5% at the high end ($5.61 vs $5.27), i.e. midpoint ~6.5% — right in the middle of the 6.5–7% corridor management telegraphed, not at the upper end Tapebrief was watching for. Reasonable but not a positive surprise on the headline rate. Status: Resolved positively (range met expectations and was reaffirmed mid-quarter)
General rate case filing (early 2026, test year 2027) — Resolved on both sides. WEC filed its Wisconsin non-VLC rate request on April 1, 2026, for forward-looking test years 2027 and 2028, with proposed base electric rate increases of 4.7% in 2027 and 4.5% in 2028; final orders expected by year-end with new rates effective January 2027 and January 2028. The Illinois rate case was filed in January 2026 for test year 2027, a key driver being the Chicago pipe retirement program; ICC decision expected by year-end. Status: Resolved
VLC tariff order (early May 2026) — Resolved decisively. The Wisconsin PSC verbally approved the VLC tariff on April 24, 2026, with ROE in the range of 10.48–10.98% and a 57% equity ratio — favorable terms. The threshold was lowered from 500 MW to 100 MW, extending the framework to a broader set of customers without disturbing current hyperscaler economics. This was the single most important binary on the print. Status: Resolved positively
Equity issuance cadence — Partially disclosed. Management indicated up to $1.1B of common equity issuance for FY2026 via the ATM program. No detail on hybrid/junior subordinated mix vs. straight common. The headline figure is consistent with the ~3% dilution drag Sullivan flagged in Q3'25. Status: Continue monitoring

What to watch into next quarter

Q3 capex plan incremental additions: Management explicitly committed that the Q3 call will include "incremental additions to the plan." Watch whether any portion of the 2+ GW Port Washington optionality or the 4–5 GW from already-approved sites is formally pulled in — and whether the $37.5B base steps materially higher.

CCGT project formalization: Paris race units and Oak Creek CTs are named with late-2027 timing, but the broader $3.4B incremental gas commitment still lacks project-level granularity. Watch for a named combined cycle gas project with site, MW, and ISD on the Q3 print.

Q2 FY2026 EPS print vs. $0.76–$0.82 guide: First-ever explicit forward-quarter guide from management — a beat or miss will signal how tight the planning process is now that VLC is settled.

Wisconsin transmission line approval (fall 2026): Binary milestone for the Vantage end-of-2027 in-service date. A delay would cascade into the 1.3 GW deliverability claim.

Illinois rate case ICC staff testimony and settlement signals: Management cited the QIP settlement as a positive marker. Watch whether the January 2026 rate case follows a similar settlement path or proceeds to litigation, which would affect the cost-recovery timeline on the $200M+ pipe replacement program.

Non-regulated renewables safe-harbor repowering disclosure (Q3 call): Management deferred detailed economics to Q3 — the PTC repowering vs. recontracting math is non-core but material to EBITDA on the WEC Infrastructure side.

Sources

  1. WEC Energy Group Q1 2026 earnings release, SEC filing — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/783325/000078332526000049/a2026q1wecearningsreleasee.htm
  2. WEC Energy Group Q1 2026 earnings call (prepared remarks and Q&A)

Get the next brief, free.

We publish analyst-grade earnings briefs the same day or morning after every call — headline numbers, segment KPIs, Q&A highlights, and tone analysis. Free during beta.

This is not investment advice.